Tanka vs Haiku: What Is the Difference?

Tanka and haiku are both short Japanese forms, they both count syllables, and neither one rhymes. That is where the similarity ends. Tanka has two more lines than haiku, and those two lines change what the poem is for.

The short answer

  Haiku Tanka
Lines Three Five
Syllable pattern 5-7-5 5-7-5-7-7
Length 17 syllables 31 syllables
Usual subject A moment in nature, observed Personal feeling: love, grief, gratitude, reflection
Where the poet stands Out of the way Present in the poem
Turning point The cut (kireji), between two images The pivot, in line three
Season word Traditionally expected (kigo) Optional
Age The younger form The older form, by centuries

Tanka came first

It surprises people, because haiku is far better known in English, but tanka is the older form. Tanka (also called waka, “short poem”) has been written in Japan for more than thirteen centuries. Haiku grew out of it much later: the opening verse of a linked-verse sequence, the hokku, eventually broke off and stood on its own, and in the late nineteenth century Masaoka Shiki gave that independent poem the name we use today.

So haiku is, in a sense, tanka’s first three lines set free. If you can hear that, the difference between the forms stops being a matter of counting.

What the two extra lines do

A haiku sets two images beside each other and stops. It trusts the reader to feel the spark and does not explain it. The poet’s job is to get out of the way.

Tanka does not stop. After the third line, it turns, and the last two lines say what the moment meant to the person who lived it. That is why tanka carries love letters and grief and gratitude, and haiku usually does not. In a haiku, the self is a window. In a tanka, the self is in the room.

Here is a haiku, the most famous one there is:

an old pond
a frog jumps in
the sound of water
— Matsuo Bashō

Nothing is added. The poem is the pond, the frog, and the sound, and the reader supplies everything else.

Now a tanka:

autumn night
again the clamor of geese
flying away
soon I will be
nobody’s child
— Ruth Holzer

The first three lines could almost be a haiku. Then the poem turns, and the geese become the poet’s own coming loss. Those last two lines are the tanka.

The pivot and the cut

Both forms hinge, but they hinge differently.

Haiku hinges on the cut — the break between the two images, where a Japanese poem would place a cutting word (kireji) and an English one usually places a dash or a line break. The cut separates.

Tanka hinges on the pivot — the third line, which belongs to the two lines above it and to the two lines below it at the same time. The pivot joins. It is the hinge on which the observed world swings around to face the poet.

If you are writing and your third line only points backward, you may have a haiku with padding. If it points both ways, you have a tanka.

So which one are you writing?

Ask what you want the last line to do.

If you want the poem to end on the world — an image, a sound, a season, and no comment — write haiku. If you want it to end on a person, and on what the image cost or gave them, write tanka. The subject does not decide this. The same frog and the same pond can go either way. What decides it is whether you intend to stay out of the poem or step into it.

One more test, from our own reading: tanka are not whimsical. If the feeling underneath the poem is not worth a reader’s silence afterward, the extra two lines will show it.


Keep reading

Published by Prolific Press
We read every submission on-screen with Submission Manager, free from greensubmissions.com — and saved a few trees doing it.